ICYMI (In Case You Missed It): Sharing Important Policy Updates

By Ahlam Moussa

|

December 24, 2020

A lot has happened in the past week! We’ve compiled a short list of important updates to help you keep track. 

1. Expansion of Filing Flexibility: On December 18, USCIS announced that it would continue its policy of flexible deadlines for requests, notices or decisions issued between March 1, 2020, and Jan. 31, 2021, inclusive. For more information, visit https://www.uscis.gov/about-us/uscis-response-to-covid-19

2. Important Update on Blank Space Policy Litigation: Good news in Vangala v. USCIS, the lawsuit that the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and Van Der Hout LLP filed last month, challenging USCIS’ blank space/rejection policy. USCIS has agreed to pause implementation of the rejection policy starting December 24, 2020; the parties will enter into negotiations to resolve the claims. NILA, NWIRP, and VDH will be reaching out as they begin discussing proposals as to how to identify applications that were previously returned under the rejection policies, as we seek to ensure that those affected have a mechanism to restore the original filing dates. If you received a rejection notice dated after December 24, 2020, you can contact counsel for plaintiffs at bspolicy@nwirp.org ASISTA is proud to support our partners in this important litigation.

3. Policy Manual Changes: Last month, USCIS announced several changes to the Policy Manual, including changes to assessments of discretion in adjustment of status cases, and determinations of lawful admission for naturalization. Along with partner organizations, ASISTA submitted comments in opposition to these policy changes which you can review here:

4. EOIR Comment Opportunities-deadlines December 28th: EOIR announced two proposed rules that would threaten the safety of survivors – including immigrant survivors – of domestic and sexual violence, human trafficking, and other gender-based abuses by drastically limiting their ability to seek continuances in Immigration Court, and to reopen prior removal orders. The Alliance for Immigrant Survivors (AIS) developed a template on these proposed rules and compiled additional resources, available here. Please voice your opposition to these harmful rules today! 

5. Issuance of Final Regulations on Asylum, Admin Closure and more: DHS and DOJ announced they have finalized the exceedingly harmful asylum rule which will be effective next month. This new rule decimates asylum options for survivors of gender based violence.  Read AIS alert here.  Several lawsuits have recently been brought in response to this harmful rule, including those brought by Lamda Legal, Immigration Equality and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP and Human Rights First. In addition, four organizations-Pangea Legal Services, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc., Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (CLINIC), and Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition – filed a complaint in the Northern District of California challenging this sweeping new rule.  They are represented by the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, and Sidley Austin LLP. 

In addition, DOJ finalized their harmful rule on administrative closure as well as the EOIR fee rule. ASISTA remains deeply opposed to these rules and will keep you informed of advocacy efforts as they develop. Read more here

From all of us at ASISTA to all of you, we wish you a happy and healthy start to 2021, and look forward to continuing our work together in the new year!

www.asistahelp.org
Our mailing address is:
PO Box 12, Suffield, CT, 06078

Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

By N/A N/A May 6, 2026
This Practice Alert summarizes USCIS’s new extreme vetting policies, including broad adjudication holds, re-review of previously approved cases, and heightened discretionary scrutiny, and explains their serious implications for immigrant survivors seeking safety and stability. It also provides practical guidance for practitioners on preparing clients for the impact of these measures and on developing case strategies and potential legal challenges. 
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
On January 23, 2026, the federal Trafficking Survivors’ Relief Act of 2026 (TSRA) became law. The TSRA provides a remedy for trafficking survivors to obtain relief from federal criminal records stemming directly from their exploitation. In enacting the TSRA, Congress acknowledged that trafficking survivors frequently acquire a criminal history as a result of their exploitation, which can be a barrier to employment, housing, education, and essential support services and make them more vulnerable to re-exploitation. This 2-pager describes the TSRA and its potential use by immigrant survivors of trafficking charged with or convicted of federal crimes.
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
Trying to help a trafficking survivor decide whether to file a T visa application? This practice advisory includes factors to consider and discuss with the client.
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
The age-in rule is a statutory provision designed to protect VAWA derivatives from losing eligibility when they turn 21. This written resource describes the age-in rule and provides practical tips for practitioners to harness its potential.
By Maria Lazzarino May 6, 2026
On Feb. 27, 2026, the BIA decided Matter of Ibarra-Vega, 29 I&N Dec. 476 (BIA 2026), which held that administrative closure over DHS objection is “inappropriate” if it is to await a U visa that is not available “in the reasonably near future.” This Practice Alert r eviews the decision and provides an initial analysis of how immigrant survivors are affected, along with some initial practice tips.